Top Business Leaders Deliver Clean Energy Plan

by Jay Kimball on 10 September 2010

Keywords: clean energy, business leaders, climate change, american energy innovation council

What do Americans spend more money on – potato chips, or energy research and development? See video below for the answer.

Seven business leaders, founders of American Energy Innovation Council, delivered a Business Plan For America’s Energy Future. The leaders are:

  • Norm Augustine, former chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin
  • Ursula Burns, CEO of Xerox
  • John Doerr, partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
  • Bill Gates, chairman and former CEO of Microsoft
  • Chad Holliday, chairman of Bank of America and former chairman and CEO of DuPont
  • Jeff Immelt, chairman and CEO of GE
  • Tim Solso, chairman and CEO of Cummins Inc.

The US is the largest consumer of energy in the world. The American Energy Innovation Council makes the case that there is a pressing need for energy innovation, and we need to invest in that innovation.
Energy R&D Spending as a Share of Sales

Though energy is a key strategic component of any countries wellbeing, US energy R&D spending has been in decline.

Energy R&D Spending

Though the US is the worlds largest energy consumer, it spends less on energy R&D than China, France, Japan and Korea.

Energy as a Share of GDP
The council’s recommendations:

  • Create an independent national energy strategy board
  • Invest $16 billion per year in clean energy innovation
  • Create Centers of Excellence with strong domain expertise
  • Fund ARPA-E at $1 billion per year
  • Establish and fund a New Energy Challenge Program to build large-scale pilot projects

The full report can be viewed here, and for more on Bill Gates call for Zero Carbon emissions, see Bill Gates on Climate Change and Renewable Energy.

  • Pingback: Masdar: The World’s First Zero-Carbon City

  • Pingback: Why the Military is Fighting for Cleaner Energy

  • Pingback: Which Energy Industries Would You Subsidize?

  • C Hristinaweberhere

    I understand your
    explanation and would love to have everything that you enter

  • Coal Portal

    Coal Industry would suggest the commodity isn’t going anywhere. Coal reports show if we have to live with it, we may as well reduce the impact of coal and CCS seems to be the best solution found to date.  Cherry http://www.coalportal.com While for some an ideal world would see no reliance on coal statistics to produce electricity,

  • http://8020vision.com jaykimball

    Coal use is on the decline in the US. There are no new coal plants on the books to be constructed.  US coal companies see the writing on the wall and are now trying to train the coal to US ports, for shipment to China and others.  For China, that is a short term solution. China is constructing rail systems to their coal fields, and won’t have much need for US coal once they have access to their own.  IN my view coal shouldn’t be burned until a  reliable CCS is in place.

Previous post:

Next post: